8 Moments and Moment-Generating Functions
For random variable \(X\) we have seen that \(E(X)\) and \(E(X^2)\) provide useful information:
- \(\mu = E(X)\) gives the mean of the distribution
- \(\sigma^2 = E(X^2) - E(X)^2\) gives the variance of the distribution.
Definition 8.1 Let \(X\) be a random variable, and \(k \geq 1\). The \(k\)th moment of \(X\) about the origin is \(E(X^k)\). More generally, for any constant \(c \in \mathbb{R},\) \(E((X-c)^k)\) is called the \(k\)th moment of \(X\) about \(x = c\).
Often times we can encode all the moments of a random variable in an object called a moment-generating function.
Definition 8.2 Let \(X\) be a discrete random variable with density function \(p(x)\). If there is a positive real number \(h\) such that for all \(t \in (-h,h),\) \[E(e^{tx})\] exists and is finite, then the function of \(t\) defined by \[m(t) = E(e^{tx})\] is called the moment-generating function of \(X\).
Example 8.1 Suppose \(X\) has the density function \[ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c} x & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 \\ \hline p(x) & .1 & .2 & .3 & .4 \end{array} \]
Then, for any real number \(t,\)
\[\begin{align*} m(t) &= E(e^{tx}) \\ &= \sum_{x=0}^3 e^{tx}\cdot p(x)\\ &= e^0\cdot (.1) +e^t\cdot (.2)+e^{2t}\cdot (.3) +e^{3t}\cdot (.4)\\ &= .1 + .2e^t + .3e^{2t} + .4e^{3t}, \end{align*}\]
and this sum exists as a finite number for any \(-\infty < t < \infty,\) so the mgf for \(X\) exists.
How does \(m(t)\) encode the moments \(E(X), E(X^2), E(X^3), \ldots\)?
Theorem 8.1 (Extracting Moments from the Moment-generating Function) Suppose \(X\) is a random variable with moment-generating function \(m(t)\) which exists for \(t\) in some open interval containing 0. Then the \(k\)th moment of \(X\) equals the \(k\)th derivative of \(m(t)\) evaluated at \(t = 0\): \[E(X^k) = m^{(k)}(0).\]
Proof. Let’s say \(X\) is discrete and \[m(t) = \sum_{\text{all }x} e^{tx}\cdot p(x).\] Then the derivative of \(m(t)\) with respect to the variable \(t\) is Then \[m^\prime(t) = \sum_{\text{all }x} x\cdot e^{tx}\cdot p(x),\] and letting \(t = 0\) we have \[m^\prime(0) = \sum_{\text{all }x} x\cdot e^{0}\cdot p(x),\] which equals \(E(X)\) since \(e^0 = 1\).
The second derivative of \(m(t)\) is \[\begin{align*} m^{\prime\prime}(t) &= \frac{d}{dt}\left[m^\prime(t)\right]\\ &=\sum_{\text{all }x} x^2\cdot e^{tx}\cdot p(x) \end{align*}\]
Evaluating this at \(t = 0\) gives \[m^{\prime\prime}(t)=\sum_{\text{all }x} x^2\cdot 1 \cdot p(x) = E(X^2).\]
Continuing in this manner, for any \(k \geq 1,\) the \(k\)th derivative of \(m(t)\) is \[m^{(k)}(t)=\sum_{\text{all }x} x^k\cdot e^{tx}\cdot p(x),\] which evaluates to the defintion of \(E(X^k)\) when \(t = 0\).
Example 8.2 (The mgf for a geometric distribution) If \(X\) is geometric with parameter \(p,\) then \[p(x) = (1-p)^{x-1}\cdot p,\] for \(x = 1, 2, 3, \ldots,\) and
\[\begin{align*} m(t) &= E(e^{tx})\\ &= \sum_{x = 1}^\infty e^{tx}(1-p)^{x-1}\cdot p\\ &= pe^t \sum_{x=1}^\infty e^{t(x-1)}(1-p)^{x-1} &\text{since }e^t\cdot e^{t(x-1)} = e^{tx}\\ &= pe^t \sum_{x=1}^\infty[e^t(1-p)]^{x-1} &= pe^t \sum_{k=0}^\infty[e^t(1-p)]^{k} &\text{where }k=x-1 \text{ is a change of index}\\ &= pe^t\frac{1}{1-e^t(1-p)} \end{align*}\]
The last step is true by the geometric series formula, provided \(|e^t(1-p)|<1\). Since \(0\leq |e^t(1-p)| = e^t(1-p),\) the series converges by the geometric series formula if and only if \(e^t(1-p) < 1\). Well,
\[\begin{align*} e^t(1-p) < 1 &\iff e^t < \frac{1}{1-p} \\ &\iff t < \ln\left(\frac{1}{1-p}\right). \end{align*}\]
In other words, yes, there exists an interval containing 0 for which \(m(t)\) exists for all \(t\) in the interval.
Example 8.3 (The mgf for a Poisson distribution) Find the mgf of a Poisson random variable \(X\) with parameter \(\lambda\). Since we’re considering a Poisson distribution, our strategy for finding the mgf will be to work our expectation to look like a power series for \(e^{\text{junk}}\).
Strategy: Work our series to include \[\sum_{x=0}^\infty\frac{(\text{junk})^x}{x!}\] since this converges to \(e^{\text{junk}}\).
\[\begin{align*} m(t) &= E(e^{tx})\\ &= \sum_{x = 0}^\infty e^{tx}\frac{\lambda^x e^{-\lambda}}{x!}\\ &= e^{-\lambda} \sum_{x=0}^\infty \frac{(\lambda e^t)^x}{x!} &\text{here it is!}\\ &= e^{-\lambda}e^{[\lambda e^t]} &\text{for all } -\infty < t < \infty\\ &= e^{\lambda(e^t-1)}. \end{align*}\]
Let’s derive our \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) formulas for a Poisson random variable using the mgf.
The first derivative is \[m^\prime(t) = e^{\lambda(e^t-1)} \cdot \lambda e^t,\] and \(m^\prime(0) = e^{\lambda(1-1)}\cdot \lambda e^0 = \lambda.\)
The second derivative is \[m^{\prime\prime}(t) = (e^{\lambda(e^t-1)} \cdot \lambda e^t) \cdot \lambda e^t + e^{\lambda(e^t-1)} \cdot \lambda e^t,\] so \[m^{\prime\prime}(0) = \lambda^2 + \lambda.\]
Now \[\mu = m^\prime(0) = \lambda,\] check! And, \[\sigma^2 = m^{\prime\prime}(0) - [m^\prime(0)]^2 = (\lambda^2 + \lambda) - \lambda^2 = \lambda,\] check again!